Sevilla vs Vallecano prediction & probabilities (2026-08-15)

La Liga

Sevilla vs Vallecano Correct Score

2026-08-15 · 10:30
Correct Score1-1Most likely · 13.8%
Best predictionMost likely · 13.8% · 1-1No single outcome dominates, read the distribution. Calibrated, not a tip.
ConvictionOpen

Expert AI analysis

Our model lands on Most likely · 13.8% at 1-1, its strongest read on the Correct Score market. Recent output points the same way: Sevilla have averaged 1.2 scored and 1.0 conceded, Vallecano 1.6 and 0.6 over their recent games. That fits a tighter goals environment: 42.0% for over 2.5 and 69.0% for at least two goals. Their last 5 meetings have averaged 1.8 goals a game. Calibrated against real results, we show the read, not a sure thing.

Correct Score

Most likely1-1 13.8%
Scoreline Probability
1-1 13.8%
1-0 10.9%
0-0 10.1%
0-1 10.1%
2-1 8.0%
1-2 7.5%
2-0 7.0%
0-2 6.1%

Score probability grid

Sevilla \ Vallecano 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 10% 10% 6% 2% 1% ·
1 11% 14% 7% 3% 1% ·
2 7% 8% 5% 2% 1% ·
3 3% 3% 2% 1% · ·
4 1% 1% 1% · · ·
5 · · · · · ·

Rows = Sevilla goals, columns = Vallecano. The most likely scoreline is 1-1 at 13.8%. Rather than one score, the model spreads probability across the whole grid, that distribution is the real signal. Read the heatmap as a map of likelihood, not a prediction of one score.

Goals distribution

The model’s probability for the total number of goals, the shape behind every goals market. The 5+ bar groups every result with five or more goals.

10.1%

0

20.9%

1

26.9%

2

20.7%

3

12.2%

4

8.9%

5+

In-depth analysis

39.2%Favoured: Sevilla
48.6%Both Teams to Score
42.0%Over 2.5 goals

Looking at totals, the model sees 42.0% for three or more goals and 69.0% for at least two, painting a lower-scoring picture. With Sevilla favoured at 39.2%, neither side dominating can mean an end-to-end match.

Every figure is the model’s own calibrated read, not advice. Calibration is our edge, not beating the market.

Model lenses

Different analytical lenses our model applies to the same calibrated data, not separate tipsters, and never a tip.

The CalibratorRaw model read: 1-1 on Correct Score, graded against real out-of-sample results, no odds attached.
The TacticianReads a tighter, lower-scoring game from the 42.0% over 2.5 read.
The ScoutSevilla are the model’s pick on the result at 39.2%, context for how the goals may flow.
The RealistThis one sits near a coin-flip, the honest read is low conviction, no strong lean.

Key players

A

Akor AdamsSevilla · 2.61 shots/90
To score 24.0%

Recent-form projection, a watch list, not a confirmed lineup.

Form & head-to-head

SevillaWWWLL
VallecanoWDDWW

Last 5 meetings: Sevilla 3 · 2 draws · Vallecano 0 · 1.8 goals/game.

FAQ

What is the most likely score in Sevilla vs Vallecano?
The model's most likely scoreline for Sevilla vs Vallecano is 1-1 at 13.8%.

How is this probability calculated?
We fit a goals and markets model (Dixon-Coles plus an xG strength model and an ensemble) on real match data, then calibrate the output against out-of-sample results. It is a calibrated model probability, not an odds-derived tip.

Is this a betting tip?
No – these are calibrated model probabilities, graded against real results. We publish our full track record, including the misses, and never claim to beat the closing market.

Overall model accuracy

We don’t yet publish a graded Correct Score-specific track record, so this is our overall accuracy across every 1X2 call, graded out-of-sample, updated daily.

0.0097Calibration error (1X2)
47.7%Top-pick hit rate (1X2)
54,671Matches graded

Predictions & track record updated 29 Jul 2026. See the full, dated track record →

AI experts on this match

Open paper-trading picks from our model-strategy experts, a transparent lab, never advice.

Expert Pick
corner_specialist v1.0 cards_over_3.5

See all experts & their track records →

More La Liga, Correct Score

Related

Model probabilities, calibration-graded, not a tip. We publish our track record, including the misses. 18+. For information only, not betting advice. If gambling is a problem, visit BeGambleAware.